‹ Today
Concise.
 Scientific American article provenance

Eric Lu factors RSA-260 using 130 digits, the largest cracked so far

They publishedWhat’s the tech behind the record-breaking RSA-260 crack?
Who / What / Where / When
Who
Scientific American — 🇺🇸 United States
credibility ●●●●○ 4/5 curated · lean center
What
  • Eric Lu posted 130 digits on X and claimed RSA-260 was divided.
  • RSA numbers are products of two secret primes; factoring undermines encryption.
  • RSA-260 factoring is the largest such achievement to date, though still small for cryptography.
  • Lu may have used hand-primal sampling with computer assistance; AI not clearly used.
  • Experts say RSA remains secure against classical attacks; quantum computing poses longer-term risks.
Where
🇺🇸 United States (outlet HQ)
topics: — · language: eng
When
published 4 Sept, 13:00Z
ingested 4 Sept, 13:58Z
Rewrite
original kept above, struck through · model ?
Retrieved
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/whats-the-tech-behind-the-record-breaking-rsa-260-crack/
Everything above is the full audit trail for this article: source, country, timestamps, the original headline, and the model that rewrote it. Nothing is hidden.