Washington Supreme Court weighs enforcement penalties totaling $618,000
They publishedWashington Supreme Court irrigation case: Farmer contests $618,000 irrigation penalties
Who / What / Where / When
Who
What
- A Washington farmer challenged $618,000 in penalties from the Department of Ecology.
- Ron Fodé claims the agency failed to provide required technical assistance before penalties.
- Dispute began in 2017 over irrigation rights and seasonal transfers for farmland.
- Penalties originate from 103 days of irrigation without adequate water rights.
- Case questions whether unpublished internal policies and procedural deadlines violated law.
Where
🇮🇳 India (outlet HQ)
topics: Politics, Economy, Environment · language: eng
topics: Politics, Economy, Environment · language: eng
When
published 11 Oct, 06:23Z
ingested 11 Oct, 07:24Z
ingested 11 Oct, 07:24Z
Rewrite
original kept above, struck through · model ?
Retrieved
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/a-washington-farmer-who-returned-to-his-family-farm-in-1984-is-challenging-618000-in-irrigation-penalties-after-the-state-supreme-court-heard-his-case/articleshow/134865485.cms
Everything above is the full audit trail for this article: source, country, timestamps, the original headline, and the model that rewrote it. Nothing is hidden.